The world’s best things will not be worth anything unless they are represented in an individual person. The people call those who represent those things the great men and the world revolves around the innovators of values, this is what we call “the normal course of the world.” The clown is a clever and intelligent man, but he lacks awareness of his talent and intelligence, for he, and always, believes only in what it drives others to believe and trust in him and the third is the day after tomorrow, as it is, and just as the people are completely, fluctuating moods, very alert senses. To name the people, it is true that we may find “uses”, such as the use of anthropologists in the context of what are cultural values, geographers in the humanistic statistic, even some “philosophers” in mahi or original such as “fate and blood”. The outcome, however much we have investigated, is no other than “uses”. This, however, does not appear more clearly than in the “political” use of this term, to the extent that we may say that political thought as a whole was not, in its long history, an attempt to define the meaning of this people, in this regard, one of the most important questions is the attempt to explain the relationship between the ruler, the leader, the leader of the people, or the justification of this relationship. The people is practically, almost “naturally”, subject to the least and the weakest? or how, in a slightly different form, does it happen that people, like Spinoza, strive to defend their bondage, as if they are defending their own freedom? and what is this secret that makes them defend from the beginning? the element that guarantees the compatibility of individual liberties with the power of society is that the individual, in terms of the citizen, is not subject to force beyond, but is subject to the force of which he is a part, therefore, the lack of meaning would be astonishing this does not mean “total will”, that is to say, “numerical pluralism” does not mean that the will of the contracting persons is “statistically”, nor does it mean the strength of the person (i.e., in representative democracy). Rather, it means “qualitative structure” or “organic structure” of the desires of all contractors, a structure that can be achieved only in the framework of a balance of voluntary interests, since it cannot arise. A contract on the basis of predominance, only by the appropriateness of will capable of ensuring the “power” of the may continue. Thus, the will of “chemistry”, as progress, not statistics, and society, if we wish to retain biological metaphor, is organic consensus, or less is an object, not an attraction or a triumph.