Today, the world is making great strides towards progress and advancement in various fields, including the social sphere, and its happiness, progress and stability. Perhaps the most striking images of progress are present in the modern society, and the decisions it adopts in its entire fields stem from multi-religious concepts, ideas. We disagree with most of them and reject them, because the first and second reality confirms their invalidity, incompetence and suitability to our society. We do not do much surprise, disdain or denial, as long as the original sources have the right to freedom in other words, if you see someone supporting, objecting, denouncing, condemning, adding or eliminating things that are incompatible with his or her nature as a human being, his or her faith as a Muslim, and his or her culture as part of a society, then that person has a personality. It is not necessarily that all that is said is true is not likely to error, and vice versa, how if this act was issued by a conscious intellectual, respect for his faith and his mind and the culture of his community, without doubt, his presence in the place of influence this positive action is required. The society also needs many of these models that reflect the high-end culture the heart of the right. Some people mistake when putting personal freedom in expression or behavior away from all that he sees as a complex and a joke in the name of progress and openness, and the most blatant to be visible, and is desirable and repeated copies of his ideals. It is a culture of melting and dilution and blind imitation pursued by some belonging to culture, while waiting for the world from you as a human being “intellectual” background and identity represent, and forced them to stand respectful; benefit from the experiences of others positive, which they found even coworkers and stone as a culture belonging to them, respect for them. The situation is even more surprising if their actions occur in their societies, which have respected their minds and entities as active influencers and trusted them in the minds of their youth, but their attitudes continue to prove their cultural bankruptcy that is absent from their society. The culture of clash and attack is rejected, replaced by fruitful dialogue if the other party who welcomes dialogue, and does not exercise exclusion and the person in order to reach the goal “right”. A society that does not respect its culture does not deserve to represent or write in its name.