Discussion: The sum of these hypotheses did not reveal in a definitive manner the quality of the relationship between the memory and the different data of the brain due to the great difficulties facing subversion. The psychological theory of Bergson confirms that the function of the brain does not observe the maintenance of kinetic mechanisms. Memories remain purely psychological. Therefore, he sees memory as two types of motor memory, which are the different motor actions that are acquired by repetition. And pure psychological memory independent of the brain and is not affected by his disorders, which is the true memory that missed the two substances recognize their nature because they are connected to the body and are not present in it. It is the spiritual endurance of any soul and land defines memory as a psychological function of building a state of mind. Whatever is always a cognitive function associated with the present and employs the past for the present and the future. Merlo Ponte also sees that Bergson offers no solution to the problem when he substituted the physiological effects stored in the brain has psychological effects or mental images stored in the subconscious. It does not explain to us how the memories return to the surface of the unconscious by arousing it as past data. If Ribo restored memory to the brain, and if Bergson referred it to the soul, Halvax in social theory refers it to a society that says: not here what is needed is to search for the subject of memories and where to keep it, because I remember it from outside. It is the social bond that I belong to that provides me with all the means to rebuild it (he also says: “when I remember, it is the others who drive me to remember) that our memories are not the restoration of past incidents, but a renewal of building according to the experience of the group and Pierre considered that memory is a social language and that the mind creates memories under the influence of social pressure and there is no past preserved in the individual memory as it is. The past is being reconstructed in the light of social logic, but Braden responds to the theory: “Society does not think about our place, so we have to be careful not to confuse memories and help molds to remember, that memories are ideas that build the past through reason. If the materialistic theory has been conducted in some experiments, we have seen the difficulty of experimentation. If the psychological theory has tried to involve the real psychological life in the spiritual life of the non-believer, the faith will not be allowed to stand between the physical, psychological and social theories. Beyond the science of persuasion whatever social theory claimed, we cannot say that when an individual remembers, he always remembers his common past with the community. So we saw how all our knowledge was unable to give any interpretation of memory acceptable to all, neither the body nor the soul or the community w